slovenian-women+vodice site for people

Religiosity try discovered to be the strongest predictor from intimate prejudice in our analyses

Religiosity try discovered to be the strongest predictor from intimate prejudice in our analyses

For this reason, we limited the analyses so you can participants’ attitudes on gay anybody, instead of specific attitude evaluations anywhere between homosexual someone

Really Puerto Ricans pursue certain interpretation of the Christian customs. Considering Christianity’s posture into homosexuality because a sinful existence, this is not alarming to track down a powerful negative connection ranging from religiosity and you may intimate prejudice (Diaz, 1998; Service provider, 1995). More over, we requested whether religiosity you certainly will boost intimate prejudice of the expanding participants’ ethical opposition to activate which have homosexual anybody and/or perceive one connections which have homosexual men and women due to the fact confident. Nonetheless, a structural design having religiosity predicting intimate bias with the almost every other analysis variables try found to be unreliable and unpredictable. For this reason, we do not trust religiosity is the riding grounds for everyone almost every other studies parameters. If you’re an input to decrease individuals’ religiosity try unethical, i manage suggest open conversations of Christianity’s stance towards the sexual orientation as opposed to gay habits within this spiritual settings (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These factors get eradicate Puerto Rican’s bad attitudes to the gay males and you may women by eliminating the main focus out-of stigma regarding gay individual so you can a specific intimate choices.

Eventually, we receive no sex differences in new connections anywhere between intimate prejudice as well as the research variables. However, the absence of gender difference is generally due to the dimension out-of intimate prejudice. The differences inside items posts within ATL and you can ATG subscales build specific reviews between them subscales unfeasible. Past education finding sex variations in attitudes on homosexuality adapted brand new ATLG items text are the same with the exception of the fresh new source category (i.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality was an excellent perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Conversely, probably the differences in intimate bias in regards to our research populace try perhaps not because of a gender dichotomy however, so you’re able to distinctions across intercourse opportunities (Sakalli, 2002). Men with greater salience when you look at the machismo and in their perceptions regarding manliness should bring greater intimate prejudice among people (Cunningham, 1998). Coming look will be speak about how item text, social thinking, and you may intercourse differences ong Puerto Ricans.

Still, comparisons ranging from our model while the approach model recommend that religiosity, self-confident experiences with gay somebody, and you can amount of affairs which have homosexual males and lesbian predicted sexual prejudice better than the fresh new choice causal station

Our very own analysis has numerous constraints. Basic, the fresh new study’s get across-sectional analysis limited the organization temporal ordering of our own parameters. Future research is explore the newest causal matchmaking between your analysis details. Second, monetary and you will financing limitations decreased the ability to assemble more substantial attempt. A more impressive decide to try which might be broke up when you look at the haphazard halves could possibly get allow for additional modifications as generated on one 50 % of the fresh test, while you are research the newest totally-changed model throughout the most other haphazard half. 3rd, research results is non-generalizable to possess Puerto Rican non-college communities. Though professionals checked motivated to take part in the study, early in the day lookup discover people who have reasonable informative attainment have a tendency to score large for the sexual prejudice (Herek, 2002). Fourth, we did not ascertain if the professionals interacted with gay guys otherwise lesbians which worry about-shared the intimate positioning or if perhaps it presumed some men and you may girls was in fact homosexuals. Fifth, the failure to evaluate exactly how many children missing contained in this for each and every classroom within the survey constraints the newest comparison from possible publicity biases. Still, given that data range occurred early in the fresh session, we feel the possibilities of dropouts and you may people maybe not browsing lecture have diminished. In the end, religiosity’s effect on intimate bias is really worth deeper exploration. Our very own research are struggling to collect details about participants’ spiritual associations. Considering the diversity out-of Religious living (85% Roman Catholic and 15% Protestant or other; CIA World Factbook (2005)), future training would be to discuss whether religiosity’s affect sexual prejudice may differ by spiritual life.

زر الذهاب إلى الأعلى